| Urperson |
= |
original,
whole/divided, enlightened/endarkened, initiated, creating person. |
| Ur-space |
= |
womb
of all becomings, the Spacio-Psychronic Continuum, multiverse. |
| Urreality |
= |
ritual,
sacramental, hieroglyphic heart space, Shared |
 |
| Creation
Enchanted |
As a millennial flowing from the still-vital source of the 20th century.
Surrealist Manifesto comes Urrealism. During his life, Surrealism's leader,
Andre Breton, was constantly revisioning and adjusting Surrealist thought
to fit the Zeitgeist and discoveries of the century. As an admirer and
student of his, I would not be worthy of him if I didn't love his work
with the same dedication. Breton sought a surreality that both liberated
and completed rational thought by joining it to the marvelous, the imagination,
dreams, and the unconscious. Though I retain that noble goal, due to the
vast amount of literature and new discoveries that were unavailable to
Breton, I must deepen Surrealism's theoretical foundation. By force of
lived experience, I am also required to temper his idealization of individualistic
surreality by joining to it the necessity for embodied ecological community,
invisible mediators and the shadow of pathology.
The revisions I am now making move us beyond loyal Breton's era. We must
leave our guiding Moses out of Egypt and cross over into the homeland that
he and our artist ancestors dreamed for us. That time/place is Urreality.
There have already been pioneers ahead of the just arriving main body.
They have already begun learning the ways of the deepening territory. I
have taken the prefix, Ur, from the work of Eugene Monick (1993) and Lee
Irwin (2001). Both men use Ur to represent wholeness in the profoundest
sense: spiritual, soulful, embodied, and erotic. Monick applies Ur to mankind
and the image of God. Irwin applies Ur to the image of the containing/uncontaining
reality. Coming home to Ur from Sur creates a subtle but powerful shift
in attitude. Sur, which means on in French, or encompassing as in the English,
surround, orients us to seek the liberation and completion of rational
thought above and all around us. That surreality was above and at the edges
and not immediate and intermediate was one of the difficulties Surrealist
philosophy had to confront as it aged. What Breton (1934) was seeking was
development of the conscious capacity to see through and to receive more
deeply. In his 1934 lecture to the Belgian surrealists, Breton said, "A
certain ambiguity contained in the word, surrealism, is in fact capable
of leading one to suppose that it designates I know not what transcendental
attitude, while, on the contrary, it expressed and always has expressed
for us a desire to deepen the foundations of the real‚ (emphasis added)
(p. 4). The homecoming to Ur from Sur assists us in keeping our focus on
the here, now and the in-between. It re-minds us that our goal is not one-sided
evasion but a fully embodied, deep experience of the mystery of life.
For Monick (1993), Urperson is a proper reformation of the Greek anthropos,
original man or mankind, also the Second Adam/Urperson/Christ. (p.97).
His use of Urperson is a move first to acknowledge and not depreciate the
presence of the feminine in the body of human and divine wholeness and
second, to acknowledge and not depreciate the presence, the suffering of
evil and turmoil woven at the heart of human experience, even unto the
knowledge of God. Monick's use of Ur offers a way through Breton's struggles
with an overly transcendental attitude in 1934 because achieving Urreality
includes lived experience of the bitter fact that the inferiority and evil
we perceive in others also resides in our own hearts.
Breton was never able to allow into Surrealism the idea that enlightenment
included endarkenment. Had he done so, Surrealism might have faired better
after the Second World War when the movement was eclipsed by the Existentialists,
who were not afraid to come to terms with human atrocity. Urperson, a wholeness
with its sense of inferiority and shadow is a paradox, an enigma that forces
a facet of life's mystery upon us; that we and our universe suffer chronic
evil, incompleteness, and division to remain whole.
Irwin (2001) describes whole space as Ur-space. Of Ur-space he writes:
The womb within which all worlds, planes, beings, and cosmologies evolve
and become -- the great All-Containing and Unbound Limitless Mother Space
-- radiant with energies from hyperdimensional superstrings to the bursting
glory of exploded stars and whole galactic clusters separated by cosmic
voids and invisible matter, thoroughly inhabited by every kind of creature
imaginable and divisible into infinite dimensions of spiritual subtlety
and difference. (p. 1)
His language brings
forth the wonder that is implicit in reality. If Monick's sense of Ur suggests
for us the importance of shadow, or Nigredo, Irwin's usage suggest the
importance of evolutionary flourishing, or Albedo. Ur-space, with its sense
of burgeoning life forces upon us the mystery that we and our universe
suffer chronic transformation, incompleteness and division because that
is the process, the birth/death of Life.
Urperson and Ur-space together form an effective pairing, one that allows
us to continue in Surrealism's quest for a symbiosis of consciousness and
unconsciousness, but a symbiosis that includes the advances in psychology,
science, and spirituality that have occurred since Surrealism's formative
years. The two also form a loving pair with Urperson being the contained
and transmuting expander, and Ur-space being the all-containing, yet breakable
vessel of transmutation Their coming together is Urreality.
Perhaps Apollinaire's original coining of the word, surrealism, and Breton's
taking it up were done too quickly. Had they known the difficulties the
movement would later encounter, I think they would have been more mindful
of the opportunity history offered them. What is described here as the
Ur/Sur distinction rested heavily upon the West's older wound between faith
and science, the loss of a healing artscience, an alchemy, an Ur-art that
combined them both.
The Urrealist's world view eases the intercourse between faith and science
by insisting on an enlightened return to what was formerly named the geocentric
universe in order to increase the value of Earth. This is in no sense a
sacrifice of the last 500 years in order to retreat into a medieval simplicity.
This return to Earth is to fully embrace the mature, now exponentially
triple value of Earthly incarnation with the consciousness that there is
a here that is science's planet Earth in the abyss of the universe, the
now of lowest sphere, the ancient Earth within the bathun of higher spheres
and an open, fertile space between.
For ages, there was no separation of the sensual world of our home planet
Earth and the reality of meanings made of air, fire, water, earth, joined
to the higher spheres. The two realities were as one. We can no longer
afford the comfortable but violent ignorance of that simplicity in an age
that features an Earth to the third power. It is possible to perceive the
Earth cubed by considering her position in the new cosmology. It is as
if the planet has shifted 90 degrees from its ancient axis and now we are
in flight, shepherded by the sun. The sun too is in flight, shepherded
by a galactic center, while the galaxy is also sailing along, circling
a center we don't know.
Under the current cosmology there are two ways leading upward. There is
an above that is literal which extends well beyond our home sphere into
infinite space and there still remains the ancient Above that is Eternal.
Throughout modernity, the sensate sphere expanded to tremendous age and
size. Today it‚'s called the universe or the space/time continuum. What
this means for us is that we can leave the planet Earth while still being
earthbound or subject to the laws of the material world. Nowadays, the
realization of the endless expanse of the Earth sphere into starry space
has revealed the wondrous fine-tuned harmony of the universe and the fragile,
singular beauty of our tiny planet Earth. Life on our pale blue dot calls
us to a collective deeper reverence, far more than what was expected in
the past, a point Sagan made well enough.
Yet, this same axial shift displaced the ancient Heaven because it materialized
the Heavenly bodies. The continuing expansion of the literal starry abyss
forced the spheres of the moon and above to take up residence within and
behind the material world. Quite wonderfully, what was once imagined as
far away and beyond death, all of the ancient higher levels of meaning,
fell closer. They now enliven even the very tissue of reality Breton intuited
this and if we pick up where we left off in the 1934 lecture, he implored,
"surrealism expresses and always has expressed for us a desire to deepen
the foundations of the real, to bring about an even clearer and at the
same time ever more passionate consciousness of the world perceived by
the senses" (Emphasis added) (p. 4) He understood that the old concepts
of ascending and descending now had to do with seeing through and receiving
more deeply. He was naturally drawn to Freud and his psychology because
it was Freud who was able to demonstrate how laden with meanings the tissue
of the body actually was. Woven into the fabric of the body were the threads
of lost Eros and memory, threads that influenced its movement.
Freud was able to demonstrate that meanings participated in embodied life,
whether individuals were aware of that or not. At that time, the unconscious
stories, complexes and constellations that were shown to compete with and
complete daytime, problem-solving consciousness gave Breton's Surrealism
a map of the terra incognita he needed. At this time, the Urrealist world
view takes into account that re-covery of the unconscious, but also travels
deeper with Jung and Hillman through to the archetypes, deeper still with
the Singing Light of psychosis, near death, spiritual and ritual experience,
deeper still to the Dreaming Ground of Being, finally arriving by not arriving
as Urpersons in Urspace where deeply embodied living is the Art. The Urrealist
lives and strives in time with direct knowledge of the timeless, in the
fullness of time.
It is possible to understand the 20th century's steady psychological descent
into the depths as a collective rising to remember of the bathun of the
spheres, a return to the Above that is Eternal. With Freud, we Arise to
the erotic memory of the Moon. With Jung, we Arise to the organizing poetic
power of the Sun. With Hillman we Arise to the initiatory archetypal depths
of the starry Heavens. With those pre-modern cultures still caring for
the ancient Heavens, those who are in love, those die and return, sin and
repent, those who pass through the psychosis, those who are born in the
spirit, those who feel the flowering of the heart, with those who see visions,
we rise and hear the choirs of the angels, the prophetic Presence. As Urrealists
we live the thrice-blessed, humble, flawed but holy tissue of being, both
here and now, Urpersons in Urspace, flesh made words.
Urrealism, then, at the beginning, requires schooling in a new literacy,
one that allows the above that is literal and the Above that is Eternal
to be joined as the here and now. The Urperson requires a way of hearing,
reading, writing, and speaking appropriate to that individual's fullest
capacity to understand. Hebrew kaballah and Egyptian hieroglyphics are
prior models of such a literacy. In both, the letters are images indicating
not only the concrete signs of the here, but also the layered symbols of
the now. In both, there is the physical image that presents itself, the
emotional story behind that image, the number that is the quality of that
image/story, the sound that is the understanding of the image/story/number,
and finally the Silence that is the beginning and end of the image/story/number/sound.
Those kinds of literacy come closest to the Ur-heart's capacity to be a
center for comprehension and expression. For Urrealists, living in a time
of ignorance of kabbalistic or hieroglyphic language, the fundamental image
is the creative product, the original art, with the understanding that
an individual's bringing to the world that which only he or she can bring
into the world is the contemporary hieroglyphic. As it was for the kabbalists
or the sacred scribes, for the Urperson in Ur-space, the created universe
itself is also hieroglyphic. Much of 20th century art is like a hieroglyphic
school attempting to speak in sacred writing in a time of tremendous materialist
compression and oppression.
Unlike Surrealism however, the important additional step to Urreality is
the fertile in-between where two or more are gathered. Urreality exists
where there is a conversation done sincerely, in a spirit of lovingbalance
with some art form. By art form, I certainly mean painting, drawing, music,
prose, poetry, construction, dance, theater, sculpture, film making, but
the list is always incomplete. We can and often do expand further into
gaming, quilting, cooking, storytelling, prayer, with passion being the
key to an art's hieroglyphic content. That the deepest conversation is
done with art means that there is a corresponding necessity to hear, to
read, to comprehend and respond to what is being stated. Instead of relentlessly
barking together at the culture from the outside, Urreality is the creative
space with an open invitation to join in. Interestingly enough, the Urrealistic
source can be found in the early days of Surrealism.
During his 1952 interviews with Andre Parinaud for Radio France, Breton
(1952) describes Urreality. He states,
"At that moment, automatic writing experienced a great revival, and more
than ever our attention was drawn to dreams...I believe we put into practice
a true collectivization of ideas, without individual reservations...We
all looked forward to enjoying the fruits of our mutual gift, of what we
had shared...Games, too, were very popular with us: written games, spoken
games which we made up on the spot. It was perhaps in these games that
our receptivity was constantly regenerated; at least they sustained the
happy feeling of dependence we had on each other. You have to go back as
far as the Saint-Simonians to find the equivalent.(p. 56)
Along with the Urreality of those early days, one of Breton's creative
means of choice over the years was the collaboration, be it with Soupault
on Champs Magnetiques, Eluard on Conception Imaculee, or with Miro on the
prophetic Signe Ascendant. He seldom created alone. In fact, it's difficult
to tell if Surreality begat Urrreality or the contrary. Either way, Urrealism
is Breton's path not taken.
Additionally, because the Urperson is freed from the Freudian fear of mysticism,
the artful intercourse is experienced as more than holographic, more than
just a third form created by the interaction of two. The merrie fourth,
the Spirit of Mediation enters when the Urlanguage is art. This is to say
that there are always invisible visitations that enter the manifold space.
Something divine can come to the table. These emerge as as-if presences,
are felt as shifts in time, are perceived when turns of phrase come forth
thick like sandwiches, trailing scintillae, are recognizable where the
cramped and constricted ease with re-newed life. In Urreality, the full
body begins to awaken to the conversation, golden chills wash over the
shoulders, warm the heart, draw attention to depth. There is a sense of
clarity about the face, a clarity of sensing. One is aroused and even the
sensate world unveils herself delighting to be seen and truly appreciated.
The heart flutters.
Urreality, as a conversation done with art, is a living ritual space for
a time hungering for a ritual that reverses the degradation and reveres
the sacredness of individual creation and the sacredness of the individual
Earth as Creation. Urreality is a doorway, a container capable of tempering
by giving direction to the present-day energy of the Apocalyptic mythos,
the time of the seventh fire. The world to come becomes lived experience
as a steady flow of unexpected revelations in the here and now. Hear and
know and the world is revitalized.
Finally, like the Surrealists, I retain their insistence on the power of
the dream. Urrealism, too, requires learning to see through dreaming and
receive more deeply. I re-assert with them the fact that dreaming is the
royal road to the unconscious, yet I must add that dreaming is our ever-faithful
companion, our guide-dog to the living underground watersource, our threshold
where we speak to the departed, our healer, our Divine message-bearer.
In dreams we find the same original and hieroglyphic technique that we
have found in our art. Our art is Shared Dreaming, dreaming shared, a cosmos
re-enchanted.
Orphan Soul (Reynolds,
1999)
When you meet the
Orphan Soul
may you talk
all night, because the time is full
may you know
the growing edge of you
the secret questions,
what your dreams told you.
Where did you
wake up in this world?
These are the
meanings, the signs I explored.
Feel your words
grow thick, the synchronistic clues
feel the golden
chills for the beautiful and true
Minds from All
Times
visit our time
Minds from all
times
are visiting
Our Time
When you meet
the Orphan Soul
talk of erotic
love, the southern and the northern pole.
As philosophers
held out their mirror
again you know
yourself.
Together the
Mind is clearer.
Once in painted
caves, cathedral rooms
in Alexandria,
the temple and the sweatlodge too.
Know each other
by laughter and heart,
by the passion
for your work and your Art.
Minds from All
Times
visit our time
Minds from all
times
are visiting
Our Time
When you meet
the Orphan Soul
talk of your
loved ones from the young
to the invisibles.
Share this ritual,
bless the human kind
with an immortal
Heart
that's in love
with Time.
Minds from All
Times
visit our time
Minds from all
times
are visiting
Our Time.
REFERENCES
Breton,
A. "What is Surrealism?" [ http://www.lyrik.ch/lyrik/lyrisurf/breton.html].
(1934).
Breton,
A. (1952). Conversations: The Autobiography of Surrealism.(Mark Polizzotti,
trans.). New York, NY.: Paragon House.
Irwin,
L. [irwin@cofc.edu]. "Ur-space: Thoughts on the Spacio-Psychronic Continuum.
Private e-mail message to F. Christopher Reynolds, [spiriman@aol.com].
30 May, 2001.
Monick,
E. (1993). Evil, Sexuality and Disease in Grunewald‚ Body of Christ. Putnam,
Conn.: Spring Publications.
Reynolds,
F. C. (1999). Unio Mentalis: The Mind of the Land. (CD). Berea, Oh.: Shirtless
Records. |